Who Manages the Quality Risk Analysis?

Who Manages the Quality Risk Analysis?

The risk quality analysis is a powerful method indeed. The power of this method depends to a large extent on the involvement of specialists of different profiles into the analysis, literally on cross-functional participation. In fact, many quality assessment techniques create complex discussions that go beyond the organizational boundaries of the project and focus the attention of key stakeholders on specific problems. However, the very multidisciplinary nature of such processes and the wide range of specialists and managers they involve can make people think about who should initiate processes and facilitate their successful implementation. The answer to this question depends on the situation. Perhaps you work in an organization with an official development process and collaborate with a quality assurance team whose task is to monitor the entire process and the quality of the whole system. In this case, quality risk analysis is probably under the responsibility of any member of this qa company.

Examining risk management in the broadest sense may help to identify and reduce significant risks that threaten the system development or maintenance efforts. It is recommended that each project have an employee who is responsible for identifying, prioritizing and mitigating risks in an appropriate way. In such cases, the risk manager will obviously be in charge of the entire quality risk analysis process.

According to expert observations, a testing team usually takes control of this process. Since the process is most effective only when is carried out by specialists of different profiles, this can have serious technical, personal and political consequences for the tester, who initiates the analysis of quality risks and facilitates its implementation.

On a technical level, this employee must have appropriate skills in the chosen technique. Informal methods are the simplest and are probably the best choice for a beginner practitioner, especially when the development process is not too heavily formalized. If there is a feeling that you need to use more complicated method such as Failure Mode and Defect Analysis, ISO 9126 or T-MAP, you had better carefully read the materials named “Choosing the right risk assessment methodology”. Perhaps you will also want to prepare a summary of the methodology for the other participants.