Offshore Testing Team: Cost of Exposure
Offshore Testing Team: Cost of Exposure
Risk levels can be assigned non-numerical (for example, high, moderate, low, none) or numerical values. Testers encounter different numerical scales during their working. Some of them prefer a 1 to 5 descending scale for each of the three variables in Failure Mode and Effect Analysis. However, one participant in a certain test management seminar said that his employee uses a 0 to 9 ascending scale based upon the Quality Functional Deployment (QF.D) technique, where 9 indicates high, 3 – moderate, 1 – low, 0 – none. D. N. Stamatis in the book “FailureMode and Effect Analysis” uses a 1 to 10 ascending scale. Be advised that offshore testing team provides its independent services to give you chance to save on development costs! Be in a rush to hire highly experienced specialists to do your work for you effectively and efficiently. Do not wait till your customers become disappointed with quality of your products – be wiser and nicely surprise them with world-class quality software and by doing so increase reputation of your company.
Cost of exposure as well as Failure Mode and Effect Analyses differ in terms of presentation and format, but one expert has found out that it is possible to convert the results obtained from one technique to the results got from another. The results of Failure Mode and Effect Analyses are transformed into COE results. The conversion took about an hour, including converting the 1 to 5 scale to the 0 to 9 scale that was mentioned for Quality Functional Deployment. Continuous integration services are quite indispensable when you want to merge all working copies of developers to a shared repository several times a day.
And finally, you ought to remember that there is no need to use the same method all the time, especially at different phases of the project. In some cases, it may be useful to conduct a business-risk focused analysis for system and integration testing and design and implementation risk-oriented analysis for unit and component testing. Probably, the informal approach is quite enough for unit and component testing, while a more formal approach such as Failure Mode and Effect Analyses is suitable for system and integration testing. You should sacrifice very little in cross-project and cross-functional coordination however the flexibility can pay off in a simpler process that requires less resources, and lets you move forward when time is a critical value. Application testing service is meant to identify all problems in software products before making them available to the wider public.
