Achieving Better Code Coverage

Achieving Better Code Coverage

It is clear, that no software can be tested as thoroughly as possible. But you may define the scope of your testing before setting out to design tests. If you strike the right balance between redundant and insufficient code coverage the chance of getting good coverage of the app increases.  

Use equivalence class partitioning and boundary condition analysis ​​to reduce the costs for testing. These technologies can be used to determine the maximum test coverage by defining a subset of input data during I / O testing.

Test those areas which are most likely to contain issues.

A well-known proverb says: “Mistakes tend to accumulate.” If a defect is found, it is most likely that a number of defects still remains hidden, expecting to be detected. If during the analysis of requirements some parts of the program are of particular concern, or there is information from the developers that some of the components have caused a lot of problems during unit testing and integration testing, the mentioned pieces of the code need to be marked in order to pay close attention to them during system testing.

Pen testing company is able to identify external and internal weaknesses that cause IT systems to lose data. If you want to protect your computer from unauthorized users you cannot but hire pen testers as soon as possible.

Focus your attention on the features and configurations that the end user will most often deal with. If the requirements specification contains a use case technique or if you have access to the performance profile of the end-user (i.e., the mathematical expectation of each function), you receive an additional source of information for test case prioritization. Most of the time allotted for testing should be spent checking the most frequently used configurations and operations.

One of the additional approaches to ensuring a more effective system testing is to argue developers into performing unit testing and integration testing as carefully as possible before handing over the code to the testing team. If program design features are submitted to the testers too often it indicates that the installation process is doomed to failure, or that the product will not work correctly after installation. A considerable amount of testing time can be saved by using some acceptance criteria that do not allow non-working software codes to be passed to the testing team members.

The scope of testing should be determined based on the test plan documents.